TiboLead source
Global reset landing tomorrow 10am PST for all paid ChatGPT accounts. Apologies for the slow start with GPT-6.1 Sol, it's now back to running at expected speeds after the massive load spike in the first two days.Read original on X
StoryFirst seen
OpenAI resets all paid ChatGPT accounts after GPT-6.1 Sol slowdown
The global reset lands tomorrow at 10am PST; Sol is back to expected speeds after a two-day load spike.
Archived Updated
Everything it touches
28 names 13 voices 18 source posts
The story’s neighborhood
NAMESVOICESPOSTS
Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.
Follow the evidence
The source posts
This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.
applied to get Sign in with ChatGPT working for Executor 🫡 this combined with v2 will lead to some super cool apps, like classification inside of codemode, being able to add inference to triggers, etc excited to get it live for everyoneRead original on X
OpenAI's new price sheet has no bulk discount. The $20 plan buys 1x Codex usage, the $100 plan 5x, the $200 plan 10x and the $500 plan 25x, which comes to exactly $20 a unit on every rung. Until this week the $200 plan bought 20x. That was $10 a unit, half the price of every other rung. A $500 plan cannot sit above a $10-a-unit plan. At the old prices it would have been the worst deal on the sheet, since two $200 plans bought 40x for $400 and the $500 plan buys 25x. Both changes arrived within a day of each other. Point (c) in the post above says OpenAI wants subscriptions and pay-as-you-go to converge until most people can just buy usage as needed. A plan that costs the same per unit at every size is a meter with a monthly invoice. The heavy user, who used to get the best rate on the…Read original on X
The domain transferred to xAI in July. OpenAI didn't announce Dots until this morning. Someone had a two month head start on the punchline. Domain transfers are public record, and so are trademark filings. Companies quietly lock down their launch domains before the keynote, which means anyone watching Whois or the USPTO database can sometimes read a product name months before it hits the stage. Either the July transfer is a wild coincidence, or somebody at xAI read the signals early and bought a joke with a 60 day fuse. The innocent explanation doesn't survive a Whois check. If xAI grabbed to catch people mistyping they'd own They don't. is sitting on the open market right now. And the exact match for OpenAI's product name, still belongs to a company that went under years ago. Nobody in…Read original on X
Read 14 more source posts
the thing is a good example of people not understanding how the internet works it just means the openai dots launch got more attention even if you think you're being really clever there's no winning. ignoring is the only move you haveRead original on X
y'all keep releasing models faster than I can bench them, but here's the latest pending results for SCB on Sol 6, Opus 5.5, and more (5.5 Max still chugging along)Read original on X
my interview with @sama: • how he uses dots to manage @OpenAI and reduce his screentime • his default speed setting (ultrafast!) • how AI might bring about a new renaissanceRead original on X
OpenAI used DevDay to unveil Dots, its fifth attempt at an AI agent product, alongside faster developer tools and a new app marketplace. Several announcements looked aimed at catching up with rivals including Anthropic and newer agent startups. Read more:Read original on X
GPT-6.1 Sol from @OpenAI on ARC-AGI (Verified): - ARC-AGI-3: 52.7%, $7.6K (standard harness), 96.4%, $4.4K (provider adapter harness) - ARC-AGI-2: 94.2%, $0.25/task - ARC-AGI-1: 98.5%, $0.06/task Its 96.4% on v3 was comparable to GPT-6 Astra's 99.9% but at a 77% lower cost.Read original on X
When I joined ARC Prize in July, the highest score on ARC-AGI-3 was 7.8% by GPT-5.6 Sol. Now, about 2.5 months later, using the same standard harness, GPT-6.1 Sol scores 52.7%. Things are moving very fast!Read original on X
I thought Gemini 4 Argon is cheap on cost per task. but DAMN GPT 6.1 Sol is even cheaper. from AA’s cost per task: > Sol 6.1: $0.72 > Sol 6: $1.05 > Opus 5.5: $5.98 this shows why Codex still has a big enterprise market and can compete with Claude’s super smart models.Read original on X
GPT-6.1 Sol is our most demanded model pretty much ever both across both the API and subscriptions. Within ChatGPT & Codex, we were under heavy load, but have brough more capacity online and the speed should get much better in the coming hours, reaching almost twice the speed compared to what we served yesterday.Read original on X
.@petergyang has tested nearly every personal agent and says dots isn’t really competing with Muse, because one is built for work and the other for your personal life: .@petergyang says dots isn’t really competing with Muse, because one is built for work and the other for personal life: "I've been testing each one, and I think there's way too many agents now that have access to my emails. I should probably turn some off." "My broad take is that dots and Grok Bot are tailored for work, and Muse and Instinct are more for personal. So I don't think dots actually competes directly with Muse at all." "It uses Astra, so it's very much designed for what they say your most ambitious work is. Asking questions about, 'How can I grow my business?' as opposed to booking restaurants."Read original on X
Because usage on your primary dot is virtually unlimited at the moment, I can’t really give a reset. I need to come up with something new fast.Read original on X
Also, 6.1 Sol was our fastest-growing model ever, and was a bit slow under load. Should be much better now!Read original on X
SITUATION DETECTED: PewDiePie says OpenAI has banned him for distillation after he used Sol's chain-of-thought outputs to train Ajax, his fine-tuned open-source AI model.Read original on X
OpenAI just published a report about a coordinated campaign to steal the hidden reasoning from its models. One day later, the most subscribed individual YouTuber on Earth posted a video showing OpenAI banned him for distillation. Twice. Here's the part most people don't get about why those bans happened so fast. When a reasoning model works through a problem, it writes a long internal chain of thought before giving you the answer. OpenAI hides that chain on purpose. The final answer is cheap to copy. The reasoning is where billions of dollars of training compute actually went, and if you collect enough of those traces, you can teach a small model to think like the big one. That's what DeepSeek was accused of back in 2025, and it's why every frontier lab now guards reasoning traces like…Read original on X
I've had 4 GPT 6.1 Sol Extra High threads running for 20+ hours straight and I still have 85% of my quota left. I'll never get to use my resets....Read original on X
Shared connections
Related stories
DeepSeek releases faster, cheaper update to its Flash model
The update is already live across major inference providers, keeping price pressure on in the open-model race.
Mathematicians scramble to digest OpenAI's breakthrough results
Researchers including Scott Aaronson describe colleagues dropping their work to unpack AI solutions to problems that stood open for decades.
OpenAI claims breakthroughs on famous unsolved math problems
Mathematicians including former OpenAI researcher Scott Aaronson say colleagues across the field are dropping their own work to understand the solutions, a signal of how quickly AI
Anthropic drafts frontier AI bill to take to lawmakers
A leading lab writing its own proposed rules for frontier AI and taking them to lawmakers marks a new phase in how AI policy gets shaped.