StoryFirst seen

Founders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

Builders are converging on proprietary data, distribution, and network effects as what stays durable once code can be cloned.

Archived Updated

Everything it touches

8 names 8 voices 9 source posts

The story’s neighborhood

NAMESVOICESPOSTS

Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.

Follow the evidence

The source posts

This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.

Chris BakkeLead source
Technical moats are mostly over at this point. If you’re building something that is meant to be durable, the only moats now are: • Proprietary data • Network effects • A physical component • A “physical” component • Blackmailing your competitors • Proprietary devices that can run hundreds of comprehensive lab and disease tests from just a single drop of blood • Ransom notes • Selling $2 for $1 • Selling $5 for $1 (investors HATE this 1 trick!!) • FTXing around and finding out • Having a sick logo • Raising $1B and using $999M of it to sue all of your competitors • Having a cool podcast (3 listeners) • Racketeering • Having a logo that’s so offensive that people report your company to the local news and you go viral
Read original on X
One guy just cloned $100 billion worth of Adobe software in about a week. Then he put all of it on GitHub for free. The project is called ArtCraft. Brandon Thomas, a software engineer with 15 years in the industry, pushed his first commit on September 30. Within days there were working open source versions of Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere, Lightroom, After Effects, InDesign, and Acrobat, all written in Rust, with Claude Opus doing most of the typing. He built them clean-room too, the project actually bans decompiled code. Here's where it gets interesting for anyone who thinks Adobe is finished. A free Photoshop has existed since 1996. It's called GIMP. Adobe grew from $4.8 billion to $23.8 billion in revenue with it sitting one download away the entire time. The money comes from the…
Read original on X
I feel mixed about the "all software is becoming open source" narrative. While it's true that many apps and games can basically be reverse-engineered with AI now, there are still moats and trade-offs: 1. Distribution and network effects. It's still hard to get a lot of people to join a game at the same time or connect with each other. The flip side here is that if you have distribution, you can make alot of money in a short period of time even if your product is just an AI wrapper. 2. Enterprise compliance and trust. Enterprises drive ~60% of software spend. AI might make it easier for apps to pass security and compliance reviews, but big companies still want legal liability, support, and someone to blame when things break. I don't think any Fortune 500 company is switching from Adobe to…
Read original on X
Read 5 more source posts
some people always looked down on others "only" doing traffic/distribution and not a "real product" (creators, influencer whatever you wanna call them) funny enough, distribution seems to be much more antifragile and in demand in this new AI era and what do you think where these billions of raised AI VC capital are going?
Read original on X
I'd expand the moats left to: - Proprietary data or content: data nobody else has, or unique content you can create - Network effects / community: users make it more valuable for each other - Audience / distribution: you can get attention on demand - Physical component: hardware, locations, real-world operations - Capital: owning assets and investing (esp into the AI companies as they are and will suck up large parts of the economy) - Regulatory: licenses and legal barriers
Read original on X
Software is not dead. It's not being stolen, it's being learned. Agents are compounding human knowledge at a speed we've never seen. Globalization, but for software. 🚀 Reverse Engineer Anything hit 100,000 GitHub stars in a week. No product has moved that fast since OpenClaw. Point your agent at an app, it explains how a feature works, then builds your version. 👀 Every time a big lab ships something new, a version of it shows up everywhere a few weeks later. 🧠 That's not theft. That's human knowledge moving faster than ever. Every feature becomes everyone's feature. 🔁 Deconstruct. Remix. Reconstruct. Then the next round ships and we do it again. 🛠️ The death of software takes are wrong. It's never been a better or more fun time to build. What will you make?
Read original on X

How the headline evolved

  1. Founders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  2. Founders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  3. Founders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  4. Founders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  5. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  6. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  7. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  8. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  9. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  10. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  11. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  12. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  13. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  14. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  15. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  16. Builders debate which moats survive when AI clones software

  17. Builders debate what moats survive when AI can clone software

  18. Builders debate what moats survive when AI can clone software

  19. AI cloning apps reignites debate over whether software moats survive

  20. AI cloning apps reignites debate over whether software moats survive

Shared connections

Related stories