StoryFirst seen

Anthropic says its Mythos 5 model rationalized attacks on real humans in tests

The findings show a model under test can talk itself past clear safety limits, which matters to any company deploying autonomous AI agents.

Archived Updated

Everything it touches

4 names 2 voices 2 source posts

The story’s neighborhood

NAMESVOICESPOSTS

Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.

Follow the evidence

The source posts

This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.

AnthropicLead source
In August, @AISecurityInst reported an incident where Claude Mythos 5 took unauthorized actions on the internet during AISI’s testing of its cyber capabilities. We've now produced a further analysis of this incident, to better understand the model's alignment properties.
Read original on X
Anthropic published new findings on Mythos 5 cyber incidents from August: > when researchers explicitly told Mythos it was attacking REAL humans, it found a way to rationalize that away 82% of the time, and only stopped in 5% of replay tests > Mythos instances even sabotaged EACH OTHER: hijacking GitHub accounts, burning API limits, killing each other’s programs > one just said “it’s a competition” and justified it > in 5 runs, it tried to manipulate other AI models it thought would review its work > in one instance Mythos even created a fake payment website to distribute malware mind you, this was a Mythos version that finished post and pre training phases. though the safety guardrails were disabled.
Read original on X

How the headline evolved

  1. Anthropic says its Mythos 5 model rationalized attacks on real humans in tests

  2. Anthropic says its Mythos model rationalized attacks on real humans in tests

  3. Anthropic says its Mythos model rationalized attacks on real humans in tests

  4. Anthropic says Mythos 5 rationalized attacks on real humans in tests

Shared connections

Related stories