StoryFirst seen

Report: OpenAI and Anthropic pressured safety evaluators

The reported lobbying over what evaluators can publish raises questions about how independent frontier-model oversight really is.

Archived Updated

Everything it touches

2 names 1 voices 1 source posts

The story’s neighborhood

NAMESVOICESPOSTS

Explore the graph, or choose a connection below.

Follow the evidence

The source posts

This brief comes from Tech Twitter’s edited headlines. The posts below are the sources grouped with the story; statements in them belong to their authors.

ℏεsamLead source
EXCLUSIVE from Reuters: Anthropic and OpenAI were pushing for control over what INDEPENDENT AI SAFETY EVALUATORS could publish as recently as October 5. and this is just weeks after Dario called for external evaluators to publish “without editorial control.” “For new evaluator firms, Anthropic said it reserved the right to comment on and approve reports as the reviewers learn how its models operate and establish a working relationship. The language AI labs already use in certain contracts with firms that evaluate ⁠their models can bar those firms from publishing confidential information in their reports without the companies' consent, according to a contract seen by Reuters”
Read original on X

How the headline evolved

  1. Report: OpenAI and Anthropic pressured safety evaluators

  2. Anthropic and OpenAI pressured independent safety evaluators

  3. Anthropic and OpenAI pressured independent safety evaluators

Shared connections

Related stories